AllAboutGod dot ning - felony.txt - 10/10/2010 A.D. - 11:14 AM

You have been suspended from All About GOD
Sorry, Edward Palamar, you can not access All About GOD as you have been suspended. If you think you've been suspended in error, you can contact the administrator.

Message to the Administrator

I do think I have been suspended in error.

Can you please speak clearly and plainly?

I am Christ's angel sent to prepare His way.

You seemed to enjoy hearing about your relative Velasco excepting the following :

You expressed your opinion about the "Prophecy of the Popes" (that which was included in Wicus' original post at the topic "Time of the Second Coming") in negative terms, stating it is of no use here, a false prophecy and that sort of thing - in essence, you referenced St. Malachy's prophecy as a prophet's crime, that is, the speaking of words which God did not tell the prophet to speak. You offered this analysis of your own without any proof of your claim. You basically minimized the prophecy into that of your own fancy by your judgement, not the judgement of Christ. You claimed that the Bible is the final authority, not Christ. So, if the prophecy is actually a prophecy given by the Holy Spirit, you have placed Christ at odds with His very book. As to where is it written in the Bible concerning punishment of prophets if they lie, I will give you the following adjurement so that you never again place any book above Christ, "Seek, and ye shall find." I have read the warnings to the prophet written in the Bible. If you cannot take my word as a brother in Christ, it is time you search the Scripture yourself for a while, rather than flaunting your education as if it were a carte blanche to commit grand larceny via infringement of copyright as AAG does, breaking the first commandment as well in its judgement against the St. Malachy prophecy.

Those verses are not for God's benefit. Yes God will surely punish false prophets, but the test of a prophet is for us humans who do not have insight into the human mind and heart.

Exactly. When Innocent II, the Pontiff to whom Malachy was informing, read the prophecy, Innocent II was comforted at seeing the ship of the Church intact until Christ's coming again, even though he was grief stricken from the schism rampant amongst his flock. If you read in the Bible, you will see that Jesus told His apostles that He would ask the Father to send the Comforter, the Paraclete, the Spirit of Truth in His name.

The test of a prophet includes the test of time. So long as you cut short the prophet in his words, you do no differently than lying, serving the father of lies.

Edward we are praying for you. I truly hope others join me in praying that God blesses you with clarity of Spirit. Are you a born again Christian Sir? Are you a child of God Edward? Have you repented of your sins and accepted Christ as Lord and Savior friend?
Jesus Christ has raised me from the dead, David Velasquez, and I know He will do the same for you.

So are you saying you are like (akin) war or that you are use to it?

The word "akin" can mean resembling, or related to in someway, not necessarily in the same way one would say "he is a kin of mine", but as one would say "a rainy day is akin to tears". Note the difference "a kin" and "akin". If you read "The Popes" by Eric John, you will see what I mean by the turbulence of the Pontificates.

That is a humongous IF. Whether your posts are removed or not are not dependent on you saying that they may not be remove, but on their soundness when they are aligned to the word.

And how is that soundness judged? By Christ? By your claim of the Bible as final authority? Or by one member who just plainly hates another without cause? Do you align them with the Word or do you judge falsely and then seek to cover up error? You brought to my attention that not anything goes here, that there are rules, and I too remind you of your responsibility in being fair. Do you honestly think that you have been fair? Show us where I have erred. Show us where they are not aligned with the Word.

Where is my penal code that I asked you for?

You didn't ask me.

Define the Church please. Tell me what is the Church? And if you arekind enough to give me the biblical reference it would be great. 
It is what Christ builds - Matthew 16:18.

So I am sorry you feel like that. If my memory does not fail me you have not prophesied anything here.
I have not alluded to a feeling. It is merely the wreckless way in which AAG handles data with regard to the Gospel.

I did ask you before and maybe you can answer me now. All the talk about resurrecting, what is that all about Edward?

You didn't ask me that, either. You'll know in good time.

This is based on your view of the situation and your assumption that you are right and that those who opposed you are wrong.

To correct your error of judgement, it is based on the statement, "In God We Trust". I have already paid you for others to share in my work. You are not my God and you are not my judge. Anyone may have legal contact with me, inclusive to the right of legal fellowship. You deny me and those others of that right in your crime. Prior to your meddling here, you have opposed my relationship with another to the point of robbing me and her, yet in that same 'godly fairness' which Christ seeks to share with His own, you have opposed Him. In that same 'godly fairness', to which the best of your claims includes to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, you fall short of your goal.

One of your first venture's here on AAG, which you view as Christ's work through you, is to address this post and attempt to manipulate the leadership, which we view that it is not Christ working through you in this case.

This is only your formulation of your opinion of me. I am only seeking to have your unjustified manipulation reversed. As you have committed the crime in a position of leadship, so must your atonement be made in that position of leadship.

Leadership has a responsibility under God and we will seek to fulfill that responsibility trusting Him to guide us along the way.

Well, you certainly are taking your good old stolen time about it!

You may agree or not agree with our decisions.

I may agree if you are correct, I may not agree if you are wrong. God does not lead us into sin.

Your post is written in a threatening manner and simply put that will not sway our decisions nor be tolerated very long.

This is your opinion of my post. Show Christ where my post is written in a threatening manner. Show me, show the rest of us. Prior to such an unproven statement you have accused me of 10 crimes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, none of which you have proven. Don't add to your list of defaming me and the American people with your unproven lies.

David responded to you and you now accuse one of our moderators by saying that you saw Satan through him.

My spiritual insight, to quote from the Bible, "a king understanding dark sentences", is not an open invitation to malign my words to the point of accusation. I expressed what I saw in his post. This is something both you and David are side-stepping. If Wicus' quotes concerning "Prophecy of the Popes" were so wrong, why had you not deleted them? The fact is, the "Prophecy of the Popes" is only a false prophecy in your own opinion. You have not proven them false, nor do you seek to allow them, nor me, to stand the test of time. This is the worst of your crime. There are people behind bars for doing far less, in terms of magnitude of offense.

Simply your opinion that we will disagree with.

You can add this to your leadship skills : It is not grammatically correct to end a sentence with a preposition. Your sentence is better constructed thus : "It is simply your opinion with which we will disagree."

When I first read of Christ's discourse concerning the convicting of the world of judgement, justice, and sin, my heart swelled with joy. That any one should ever give cause to God, who has said, "I desire mercy", to exert Himself in those convictions, is not being kind.

The reality is that Satan is attempting to conquer all people, including you, even the elect, if that were possible.

Satan is not attempting to conquer me, he has lost the battle forever.

We hope that the love of Christ continues to be demonstrated here.

You do not demonstrate love of Christ by condemning that which God has made Holy and His Word!

You accuse that this is not the case by stating that you hope we return to it. That is your perception, in error as it is, is your right to feel that way.

I am defending the right of St. Malachy, or any other of the elect, to be a part of allaboutgod.net. Until you prove here that the "Prophecy of the Popes" is a false prophecy, I hold your sin bound. This includes your illegal removal of my posts in regard to such defense. My perception is not in error, your conduct is. The only feeling that comes into play is your sadistic hatred of Christ and His Scripture, seeking to torment the very man who cries, "I desire mercy." even though He died in torments to save your soul.

One is free to join this site. Remaining here depends on how one conducts themselves according to the rules. Break the rules and you will be banned. It is as simple as that.

That is not so, because I hold your sin bound. You need to atone for your crimes in order for that to be true.

I was taught that your first impression should be your best impression. There is no assumption on my part.

Concerning what LT mentioned about signing on, AAG also has responsibilites, which do not include copyright infringement.

Responding to an already quoted passage which David V. has judged to be criminal does not constitute criminal activity. Like the law is written, if a prophet lie, it is between God and the prophet. I am willing to treat Wicus this way, even if he merely quoted something of another. But if I do not give the time to allow something to come to pass, I am to blame. If AAG is so adverse to the quote Wicus had put up, why had not been removed?

My take on this is that somewhere, somehow, someway, as Roy Wilson described, God's wonderful grace is working in David V. It is nothing new that the Pontificate is something akin to a war ground. As mentioned about wolvery, Christ did say, "I am sending you out as sheep among wolves."

If the Catholic Church, the Church, is not a condemned institution, the tenet of Apostolic Succession is not condemned either. Add to this the law of allowing a prophet or prophetess to prove him or her self, one can not nor may not remove any of my posts here nor elsewhere, nor may I be banned until proven to be the false prophet to which it is alluded that I am. Any violation as such is not only a civil crime, but a crime against the Church as well. While we are on the point of civil crime, penal code, Church and State, etc., the following statements need to be reiterated :

The State has in times past committed murders and has wilfully denied doing so. The State has lied. The Church has only been accused of doing this. It has never been proven that the Church has committed murder nor any crime of any sort.

It is just such a battle ground which influences the decisions as a moderator. This is understandable, this has been the way the world has been. Christ has said concerning His Church, "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it." This is a grace at work. Though, as sinners, we did not deserve such a nicety, He has bestowed it to us freely and with love.

I do not advise any one to openly condemn the Church nor to break the Law. Give it the care and time that the matter deserves.

In as much as Christ has placed us above all things, we are not to covet and hoard as individuals.

A warning is not a crime if it is spoken in prophecy. A warning is crime, when spoken in blasphemy. On this latter sentence, civil law often seeks to establish the continuity of a threat to a further crime to prove the threat, and even to prove the further crime in terms of the threat. As such do I find the attitude of AAG towards me. Whether judged by my first deed or my last, it is hinted that I am a savage wolf.

I have met others having such perspectives. I am grateful for you efforting to continue peaceful discussion.

http://www.nonbelieverforums.com/forums/entry.php?15-The-Censorship-of-Rapture-Ready...

I will address this part, here in quotes below, of AllAboutGod.NET :

"Having said the above I must say that there are times we will respond instantly and harshly. There are times wolves come here in sheep’s clothing. There are people who come here and attack the central doctrines of the Christian faith. They will be met swiftly and rebuked. A good (under)shepherd will protect the sheep from ravenous wolves and must."

Making an opening statement as such in the form a prediction, even a prophecy, by law, needs to stand the test of time. The Bible is clear about this. One is to heed a prophet only if that which is foretold comes to pass. If the prophet should lie, it is between God and the prophet.

At what juncture this statement was made is important, however, if, in fact no one has ever nor will ever meet the criteria outlined in the paragraph, not only is the statement a lie and a false prophecy, it is a violation of civil law, specifically, inciting to riot.

Jesus Christ, has shown and taught in His life and works, that the Good Shepherd lays down His life for His flock. Note that I retain the proper use of capitals in referencing Christ and His work. This written respect not only serves the Master, but His servants as well. Anyone wishing to follow Christ must lay down his life first.

To propound that one, inclusive to God himself, will act in a violent manner, specifically "instantly and harshly", is contrary to the teachings of Christ and the Holy Bible. So, while this scare tactic might work for one leading astray another, as in the case of training a suicide bomber, it does not fly in any effort with regard to the brand-new believer in Christ Jesus.

My experience at AllAboutGod.NET thusfar has included actions that are not legally compliant with the FCC, thereby putting your site and members at risk. As the Bible is also clear about being in accord with civil authority, there is no valid reason for this charade which you attempt to lodge as a teaching of Christ.

It would serve the moderating staff, members and viewers at large to set aside a locked section proving this part of AllAboutGod.NET policy. It's one thing to talk the talk, but a totally different thing to walk the walk. If in fact you have had occasion to promote your inciting to riot, you are bound by law to bring forth evidence as such.

Subject: Re: AllAboutGod dot ning - felony.txt - 10/10/2010 A.D. - 11:14 AM

» poleshift dot ning dot com & politics dot ie
» abovetopsecret dot com