| Visitors | 
|
| November 2024 | | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|
| | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |  Calendar |
|
|
| | Samuel Whitefield |  |
| | | Author | Message |
|---|
Admin
Admin
Posts : 724
Join date : 2011-02-25
Age : 68
Location : Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | Subject: Samuel Whitefield Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:52 pm | |
| The word "antichrist" is not found in the Old Testament. You have also failed to do your homework regarding the word "vile" : check it out, Sam, the word "vile" describes the king of Daniel 11:20. Beginning with the printing of the Coverdale Bible in 1535 A.D. the word "vile" was moved from verse 20 to 21. The Douay-Rheims and Wycliffe Bibles are correct. As a further note, your use of "Antichrist" as such, as well as others like you, was addressed in criminal court earlier in the year when you had posted your October, 2013 A.D. written attack. Formally, that specific king of Daniel 11:21 was defeated no later than the 1,335th day of Daniel 12:12, Ascension Sunday, May 8, 2016 A.D. Specifics are included in the link below, I'll gladly answer any question that hasn't already been covered there, thank you. Regular updates to the countdown to the Day of the Lord by the sign of the Son of Man in Heaven at : https://risen-from-the-dead.forumotion.com/Just as a reminder, you have no legal rights to represent me as you have written. | |
| | | | | | Samuel Whitefield | |
|
| | Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
