Christian Reincarnation (Yahoo Group)

			Free forum : Resurrected and Raptured Free forum : For Christ's Resurrected and Raptured Saints
			View on risen-from-the-dead....	Preview by Yahoo

In essence, I have been reincarnated twice.

But it has been how God created His angel sent to prepare His way.

I consider myself an exception in this and expect that others, but not necessarily all others, might experience one reincarnation.
___________________________________________

Yeshua/Jesus did not come to promote belief in the Messiah/Christ - neither did he come to promote the worship of Messiah/Christ - Yeshua/Jesus came to teach the people TheWay to become Messiah/Christ, and fulfill the vision of a Kingdom of Priests and a Holy Nation of Anointed (Messiah/Christ) Disciples who are set aside for the service of the Most High God that Yeshua taught was the Father of all of mankind. This must be done through the Key of Knowledge to open the inner door to the Kingdom.  The majority of the Roman and Greek followers who were too Pagan to embrace the teachings of Yeshua, were not interested in a life of genuine change and spiritual transformation, so they made Jesus their God so they didn't have to pick up their own cross and follow in TheWay. Thus, the Church itself betrayed and crucified Messiah/Christ when it immersed itself in the way of the heathen, and worshiped the messenger instead of imitating the pattern and example that Yeshua set as the required standard for all those who called upon the name of the Lord. The Good News is that once you understand and are willing to live in accordance with the Original teachings of the New Covenant, the Promise is that you will Know the Truth for yourself as you are permitted entrance into the Kingdom within you (Lk 17:20-21).
http://ChristianReincarnation.org
http://MasterIndex.Nazirene.org/
http://BrotherOfYeshua.com
http://Ebionite.com
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org
http://GateOfEden.com
http://BeingOfLight.com
http://Nazirene.org
http://LightOfYeshua.org
http://TheThreeLies.com
http://GospelOfTheNazirenes.org

One of my older brothers back in the 1960's A.D. showed me a television broadcast about Jesus' expulsion of Legion into the swine.  I had occasion to watch that video again last week, and how it showed that Jesus more than likely went on a sea voyage to what today is now southwestern Spain in order to do so.  In that same video it was also shown how some of the 'minor' Gospels were found in old clay pots, as I noticed at your link you begin with a reference to the Gospel of Thomas.

You also write "Spiritual Truth", and in another Gospel Jesus plainly states that He, Jesus Christ, is the Truth.

You use "reincarnation" in your site name, and I often avoided the use of that word because of what is taught about the sanctity of Jesus' Incarnation.

But I've managed to see things in my limited perspective for what it really is.

The Day of the Lord (Malachi 4:5) is not strictly "dreadful", as your reply implies, it is also great, neither you nor I can stop it.

The fact that others have failed to interpret accurately certain Scriptures is a peculiar fault, not a global one.

It just doesn't make sense to me that if God were to make an angel from human flesh that He would use for His purposes only, that there would be much on-hand information available except that which is delivered by that messenger.

Any further testimony from witnesses would add to the credibility of the source.

But to deny any possibility of such occurrence on the basis of human judgment is to pit oneself against God in the spirit of rebellion.

What I wrote is witness to more than fifty-nine years of conflict and revelation, all of it having already been foretold in prophecy.

From the standpoint of the General Resurrection of the Dead, that older brother of whom I wrote at the beginning of this reply is in need of resurrection, as is the case for many others, yet that brother is one of a group of three kings foretold in Daniel 11:2, and only by the grace of God shall such needs be met.

That might seem harsh to you that one can be seen to be in need of resurrection, but that is part of Jesus' Gospel, "Ye all must be born again."

God did that for me many years ago, and after some 1,925 years He has raised me into the kingship of Daniel 8:23, Daniel 11:3-4, and Daniel 11:21, to cite a few verses.

But Scripturally, there is nothing in this that negates the validity of me being reincarnated, resurrected, and raptured.

We are living temples of the Holy Spirit, and that is what God has at His use for His Eternal Kingdom, of which there is no end.

Regarding Jacob being known as James :

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.vi.v.html

There is much presumption in your question contrary to the accuracy of the count without any proof of contrary evidence.

The evidence of the accuracy of the count outweighs your contradiction :

The intellect and the return of the Son of Man :

			The intellect and the return of the Son of Man :    ±  JMJ In terms of Christ sending His angel to prepare His way, it was unknown to me that I was being resurrected, that Christ was showing forth His return,
			View on risen-from-the-dead....	Preview by Yahoo

That information was made available to you before December, 2015 A.D.

Your 'contras' have only since been in 2016 A.D.

The first sentence in the first link in the post to which I am replying should end, "of which I am measured", not "that I am measured by".

Fix that first, then you might actually discover who you are and you also might be able to think more clearly.

Abusing the English language is not a good practice.

When there is a way to end a sentence without a dangling preposition, that is the route to go.

"Were any of your authorities which you quote there at the time?"

Here again, there is presumption in the question, plus ambiguity, and confusion.

Which authorities?

How do you derive them as "mine"?

Which quote?

At what time?

And that's your initial statement in your reply.

I also noted that you haven't fixed the dangling preposition yet either.

Let's look at that initial statement there :

"In reading through these lives a person may have asked themselves the question, why is this important, and how can I know that this information has anything to do with the standard that I am measured by?"
 
Which lives?

There is a prevalent ambiguity in your writing which leaves to chance what you are really trying to say.

Concerning the English language as to the bulk of the original writings concerning Jesus' disciples witness concerning Him, the first English translation of the Holy Bible is the best place to start, that being of John Wycliffe.

They were still hand written back in 1378 A.D.

The devil hated John Wycliffe so much for having translated the Holy Bible into the English language, that years later, he had some bigots dig his entombed body from his grave just to burn it.

There is a 16th century prophecy concerning your approach to Holy Scripture and your use of Roman demonization :

Century X : #20

	Century X : #20 Century X : #20
	View on nostradamus.org	Preview by Yahoo

 
Whether you've realized it yet or not, but sins against the Church are self-degrading.

There is no "if" to me.

It isn't a matter of yes or no.

It's coming no matter what.

That is why I have been sent.

"He who has ears to hear, let him hear." (He who has eyes to read, let him read.)

Babes, milk, meat, strong drink, . . . that doesn't even enter the picture.

The English language has rules of grammar which are just as easy to follow as they are to break.

In terms of rebellion, you give the devil an orgasm.

The message I've conveyed is borne out of zeal for God's glory, the thrill and excitement that His special day, which has been foretold for so many times for so many years, shall be here in only 124 more days.

That's assuming I'm a prognosticator, and as I recall correctly, at the time the actual accurate counting to the end of days was ascertained, I was your prisoner for crimes I did not commit, for which, in an effort to save face, you chose perjury instead of honesty and kindness.

As for Cayce, he also said not to drink orange juice with grains, so much for fortune cookies.

Given Churchhill's choice of words in that clause, that is, still, grammatically, the best way to arrange them.

It's the old saying that if everyone else is putting their hand's in the fire, does that mean that you have to, too.

Speaking against Jesus does not equate with some higher spiritual perfection, nor a better grasp of grammar.

So after Jesus drove you into the swine, the thought of being food for man didn't appeal to you and you decided to end it all, assuming that things would get a little easier later by entering websites.

In about 123 days it'll be real easy for you, you'll never need to go anywhere ever again.