| Visitors | 
|
| May 2024 | | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|
| | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | |  Calendar |
|
| | | Regarding wikipedia's abuse of St. Bernard of Clairvaux via Paolo Sarpi |  |
| | | Author | Message |
|---|
Admin
Admin
Posts : 724
Join date : 2011-02-25
Age : 67
Location : Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | Subject: Regarding wikipedia's abuse of St. Bernard of Clairvaux via Paolo Sarpi Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:22 pm | |
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate_ConceptionCiting Edward Gibbon's citing of Paolo Sarpi's unconfirmed report of St. Bernard's supposed condemnation of the Immaculate Conception is not a valid citation, it only constitutes a violation of "NOR" (no original research) by Sarpi, Gibbon, and editor(s) who originally included it in the article. There is no proof that St. Bernard condemned the Immaculate Conception. The devil despises the special devotion St. Bernard had for the Blessed Virgin and attacks him through the article at wikipedia. A similar physical attack by the devil was attempted murder on August 20, 2013 A.D. in mockery with the hopes that I would die the following day, the same day that St. Bernard of Clairvaux died, August 21. I am not sorry for having disappointed the devil. | |
| | | | | | Regarding wikipedia's abuse of St. Bernard of Clairvaux via Paolo Sarpi | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| | Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
